Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾǰñ ½ÇÇ躴¼Ò¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF ARTIFICIALLY PRODUCEDBONE LESIONS IN HUMAN MANDIBLE -Radiologic and Densitometric Eva1uation-

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1987³â 17±Ç 1È£ p.107 ~ 122
ÀÌ¿µÈ£, ±èÁ¾¹è,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ¿µÈ£ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
±èÁ¾¹è (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract

8°³ÀÇ ÇϾǰñ¿¡¼­ ¾òÀº 57°³ °ñÀýÆí¿¡ Çü¼ºÇÑ 131¿¹ÀÇ ½ÇÇ躴¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ºÐ¼®
¹× ³óµµºÐ¼®°á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. 41.3%(54¿¹)¿¡¼­ Çظé°ñ³» º´¼ÒÀÇ È®ÀÎÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. Ä¡±Ù´Ü º´¼Ò°¡ ÀÏ¹Ý °ñ³» º´¼Òº¸´Ù Çظé°ñ³»¿¡¼­ÀÇ È®ÀηüÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
3. Ä¡±Ù´Ü º´¼ÒÀÇ °æ¿ì ´ë±¸Ä¡º´¼Ò¿¡¼­ Çظé°ñ³» º´¼ÒÈ®ÀηüÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ÀÏ¹Ý °ñ³»
º´¼ÒÀÇ °æ¿ì Ä¡Á¶°ñºÎÀ§ º´¼Ò°¡ ÇϾÇüÇϹæºÎ º´¼Ò¿¡ ºñÇØ ¹ß°ßÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿´´Ù.
4. 75.6%(103¿¹)¿¡¼­ Ä¡¹Ð°ñ ħ¹ü¾øÀ̵µ º´¼ÒÈ®ÀÎÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´Ù.
5. À°¾ÈÀûÀ¸·Î ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû º¯È­¸¦ Æǵ¶ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Â Çظé°ñ³» º´¼ÒÀÇ º¯È­»óÀ» ,³óµµ°è¸¦ »ç
¿ëÇÔÀ¸·Î½á Á¤È®È÷ ÃøÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ƯÈ÷ ÀÏ¹Ý °ñ³»º´¼Ò¿¡¼­ÀÇ Çظé°ñ³» º¯È­»óÀ» °üÂû
Çϴµ¥ ÀÖ¾î À¯¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was three-fold: to reexamine whether periapical and central
lesions can be detected on the radiograph when they are in the cancellous bone, to
investigate regional differences in radiographic visualization of the lesion, and to compare
the interpretation of radio-graphs by densitometric analysis with the visual interpretation
of the same radiographs.
Forty-nine apical lesions and eighty-two central lesions were made in 8 mandibles
and radio-graphed serially while being enlarged and deepened. All radiographs were
evaluated by three dental radiologists. Each lesion was scored of 3 to 0, based on the
radiographic appearances.
Special radiographs of 15 apical and central lesions were analysed by densitometer and
the results were compared with the scores which were previously assigned by three
examiners.
From this study the following conclusions could be drawn;
1. Experimental lesions confined to cancellous bone were detected on the radiographs in
41.3% of the cases.
2. Visualization of periapical lesions in cancellous bone was more apparent than that of
central lesions in cancellous bone.
3. Visualization of the periapical lesions confined to cancellous bone was highest in
molar teeth, and detection of the central lesions in alveolar portion was easier than
those in lower portion of mandibular body area.
4. It was possible to detect the experimental lesions without cortical plate involvement
in 78.6% of the all lesions.
5. Densitometric analysis of radiographs could reproducibly distinguish bone changes,
especially of central lesions in cancellous bone.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸